A coordinated national UK liver transplant program response, prioritizing waitlist recipients with the highest need, provided excellent outcomes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare provision has been severely affected by COVID-19, with specific challenges in organ transplantation. Here, we describe the coordinated response to, and outcomes during the first wave, across all UK liver transplant (LT) centers. METHODS: Several policy changes affecting the liver transplant processes were agreed upon. These included donor age restrictions and changes to offering. A "high-urgency" (HU) category was established, prioritizing only those with UKELD > 60, HCC reaching transplant criteria, and others likely to die within 90 days. Outcomes were compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: The retrieval rate for deceased donor livers (71% vs. 54%; P < .0001) and conversion from offer to completed transplant (63% vs. 48%; P < .0001) was significantly higher. Pediatric LT activity was maintained; there was a significant reduction in adult (42%) and total (36%) LT. Almost all adult LT were super-urgent (n = 15) or HU (n = 133). We successfully prioritized those with highest illness severity with no reduction in 90-day patient (P = .89) or graft survival (P = .98). There was a small (5% compared with 3%; P = .0015) increase in deaths or removals from the waitlist, mainly amongst HU cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully prioritized LT recipients in highest need, maintaining excellent outcomes, and waitlist mortality was only marginally increased.

A coordinated national response maintained a safe and effective UK liver transplant program during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

P091 Figure 1Number of livers from UK deceased doners offered, retrieved and transplanted, 4 February 2020 to 5 April 2021[Figure omitted. See PDF]DiscussionA sophisticated national response has maintained a safe and effective UK LT program throughout the first year of COVID. We adapted our resources, implementing phased donor restrictions and a new category for recipient prioritisation. Patients benefitted from collaborative working, enabling those in most need to be transferred and transplanted in protected centres. Consequently, we mitigated against a significant fall in LT activity. Our collaborative response serves as an as exemplar for other specialist healthcare services.